On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:51:06AM +0000, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) wrote: > SYNCHRONIZE CACHE (16) should be favored over SYNCHRONIZE > CACHE (10) unless SYNCHRONIZE CACHE (10) is not supported.
I gues you mean (16) for the last occurance? What's the benefit of using SYNCHRONIZE CACHE (16) if we don't pass a LBA range? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
