On 08/11/2014 08:33 AM, Venkatesh Srinivas wrote:
Should we wrap the sdev->device_busy read and test in a new scsi_device_busy(), so as to preserve the old polarity?
I don't see a difference in polarity, or at least replacing '== 0' with '!' is not a reverse in polarity for me. Anyway, I don't really care if or how this is wrapped, as long as it is getting fixed. Thanks, Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
