Hi, On 09/13/2014 07:50 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 12:28:41PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Yes this one does the trick and fixes things. Note the git tree I used for >> testing also had your previous fix to split up the blk_tcq union in 2 >> separate struct members. Let me know if you want me to re-test without that >> fix. > > I'm pretty sure that isn't needed, so double testing it indeed doesn't > would be helpful.
I can confirm that things still work fine with the union left in place. > I'd like to add your Tested-by: tag after that, too. Ack: Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> Regards, Hans -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
