On 09/29/2014 04:06 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:59:02PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: >> libata already uses an internal buffer, so we should be using >> __scsi_print_command() here. >> >> Cc: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org> >> Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org >> Cc: LKML <linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org> >> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <h...@suse.de> > > Applied to libata/for-3.18. > > Thanks. > Errm. Nice that you did, but it sort of relies for patches 01-32 to be applied previously. I'd rather apply your Signed-off-by: to the patch and have it routed through the SCSI tree; that way we're sure it'll only be applied if the previous patches are in.
Can you please pull it from libata to avoid build issues? Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage h...@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
