Hi,

On 10/01/2014 02:45 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 10:17:41AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> The problematic part here, which I believe is caused by scsi_mod.blk_mq=Y,
>> is the tag number 33. uas.c does the following in slave_configure:
>>
>>      scsi_activate_tcq(sdev, devinfo->qdepth - 2);
>>
>> Where qdepth is 32, so 30 gets passed in. uas.c stranslates scsi tags
>> to uas stream ids, which means it adds 2 (stream ids start at 1 not 0,
>> and 1 is reserved for untagged commands).
>>
>> So the tag 33 above, means that the scsi subsys has called uas.c with
>> a tagged command with a tag of 31, which should not happen when using
>> scsi_activate_tcq(sdev, 30).
>>
>> So should the uas.c code do something different with blk-mq to tell
>> it to only use tags 0-29, or is this a blk-mq bug ?
> 
> This is a mismatch between the (undocumented) existing behavior and
> what blk-mq implements.  In the old code unless you use host-shared
> maps you would never see a tag number greater than the queue depth
> when using block layer tags.  With blk-mq we also use host-wide maps,
> so you can easily see tag numbers bigger than the queue depth.
> 
> So far it seems uas is the only driver with this expectation.
> Given how it maps tags to a non-scsi concept it might be better to
> just use a separate bitmaps for the streams inside uas than reusing
> the tags.

So let me see if I understand this correctly, blk-mq will never queue
more then qdepth commands, but it will use higher tag numbers ?

If that is the case fixing this should be easy, uas already has
an array to map stream-ids to scsi cmnds so that when it gets a status
urb, it can find the scsi cmnd which belongs to that status urb. We
can just search for a free slot in that array.

> Is this mapping an implementation detail of the Linux uas
> driver or part of the spec?

The mapping is a Linux uas implementation detail, the spec is
silent on how to map things.

Regards,

Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to