On 4/1/2015 8:49 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 10:51 +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
On 3/30/2015 6:28 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
From: Nicholas Bellinger <n...@linux-iscsi.org>
This patch adds a new target_core_fabric_ops callback for allowing fabric
drivers to expose a TPG attribute for signaling when a T10-PI protected
fabric wants to function with an un-protected device without T10-PI.
This specifically is to allow LIO to perform WRITE_STRIP + READ_INSERT
operations when functioning with non T10-PI enabled devices, seperate
from any available hw offloads the fabric supports.
This is done using a new se_sess->sess_prot_type that is set at fabric
session creation time based upon the TPG attribute. It currently cannot
be changed for individual sessions after initial creation.
Also, update existing target_core_sbc.c code to honor sess_prot_type when
setting up cmd->prot_op + cmd->prot_type assignments.
Cc: Martin Petersen <martin.peter...@oracle.com>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sa...@mellanox.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
Cc: Doug Gilbert <dgilb...@interlog.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <n...@linux-iscsi.org>
---
drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c | 44
+++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
drivers/target/target_core_transport.c | 8 +++++++
include/target/target_core_base.h | 1 +
include/target/target_core_fabric.h | 8 +++++++
4 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c b/drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c
index 95a7a74..5b3564a 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c
@@ -581,12 +581,13 @@ sbc_compare_and_write(struct se_cmd *cmd)
}
static int
-sbc_set_prot_op_checks(u8 protect, enum target_prot_type prot_type,
+sbc_set_prot_op_checks(u8 protect, bool fabric_prot, enum target_prot_type
prot_type,
bool is_write, struct se_cmd *cmd)
{
if (is_write) {
- cmd->prot_op = protect ? TARGET_PROT_DOUT_PASS :
- TARGET_PROT_DOUT_INSERT;
+ cmd->prot_op = fabric_prot ? TARGET_PROT_DOUT_STRIP :
+ protect ? TARGET_PROT_DOUT_PASS :
+ TARGET_PROT_DOUT_INSERT;
In this case, if the protect=1 and fabric_prot=1 we will strip won't we?
I think that the protect condition should come first.
Mmm, not sure I follow..
sbc_check_prot() is only ever passing fabric_prot=1 when se_cmd prot
SGLs are present and se_dev does not accept PI, regardless of protect.
It's a little confusing that fabric_prot is set if the backend device
does not support PI.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
