> On Oct 29, 2015, at 2:01 PM, Don Brace <brace77...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 10/29/2015 11:43 AM, Matthew R. Ochs wrote: >>> On Oct 28, 2015, at 5:05 PM, Don Brace <don.br...@pmcs.com> wrote: >>> >>> From: Kevin Barnett <kevin.barn...@pmcs.com> >>> >>> remove repeated calculation that checks for physical >>> or logical devices. >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Scott Teel <scott.t...@pmcs.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Justin Lindley <justin.lind...@pmcs.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Kevin Barnett <kevin.barn...@pmcs.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Don Brace <don.br...@pmcs.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/scsi/hpsa.c | 23 ++++++++++++++--------- >>> drivers/scsi/hpsa.h | 1 + >>> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c b/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c >>> index d011540..7c1a552 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c >>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c >>> @@ -3761,6 +3761,7 @@ static void hpsa_update_scsi_devices(struct ctlr_info >>> *h, int hostno) >>> int ncurrent = 0; >>> int i, n_ext_target_devs, ndevs_to_allocate; >>> int raid_ctlr_position; >>> + bool physical_device; >> Any particular reason for using a bool here and a u8 when you cache the >> value? > Changed definition to u8 physical_device : 1; in hpsa_scsi_dev_t > >> >>> DECLARE_BITMAP(lunzerobits, MAX_EXT_TARGETS); >>> >>> currentsd = kzalloc(sizeof(*currentsd) * HPSA_MAX_DEVICES, GFP_KERNEL); >>> @@ -3821,16 +3822,17 @@ static void hpsa_update_scsi_devices(struct >>> ctlr_info *h, int hostno) >>> int rc = 0; >>> int phys_dev_index = i - (raid_ctlr_position == 0); >>> >>> + physical_device = i < nphysicals + (raid_ctlr_position == 0); >>> + >>> /* Figure out where the LUN ID info is coming from */ >>> lunaddrbytes = figure_lunaddrbytes(h, raid_ctlr_position, >>> i, nphysicals, nlogicals, physdev_list, logdev_list); >>> >>> /* skip masked non-disk devices */ >>> - if (MASKED_DEVICE(lunaddrbytes)) >>> - if (i < nphysicals + (raid_ctlr_position == 0) && >>> - (physdev_list-> >>> - LUN[phys_dev_index].device_flags & 0x01)) >>> - continue; >>> + if (physical_device && >>> + MASKED_DEVICE(lunaddrbytes) && >>> + (physdev_list->LUN[phys_dev_index].device_flags & 0x01)) >>> + continue; >> In this conditional you swapped the ordering, evaluating physical_device >> first, why? > Changed it back. Better to be consistent.
With these changes I'm fine with you adding Reviewed-by: Matthew R. Ochs <mro...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
