> @@ -127,9 +127,8 @@ static struct iscsi_param *iscsi_set_default_param(struct
> iscsi_param_list *para
> char *name, char *value, u8 phase, u8 scope, u8 sender,
> u16 type_range, u8 use)
> {
> - struct iscsi_param *param = NULL;
> + struct iscsi_param *param;
>
> param = kzalloc(sizeof(struct iscsi_param), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!param) {
> pr_err("Unable to allocate memory for parameter.\n");
>
>
> This way it would be _far_ more readable.
I guess that there are some opinions available for this implementation detail.
> IMHO one should have a 1 action per line of code style
How often do you care for such style issues?
> and only assign values in at declaration time if really necessary.
Which is or might become the official Linux coding style recommendation
for this aspect?
> But what is the benefit from this? Is it fixing a (hypothetical) bug?
I find the shown null pointer initialisation just needless.
Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
