On 01/22/2016 01:49 PM, Lee Duncan wrote: > From: Hannes Reinecke <h...@suse.de> > > Some older user-space code might rely on the netmask attribute > being present, so we should always display it. > This fixes a regression introduced by commit > 0b2eb3c4060a16f3ec11a4d6d4c934e7e5d5334f. > > Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <h...@suse.de> > Signed-off-by: Lee Duncan <ldun...@suse.com> > --- > drivers/firmware/iscsi_ibft.c | 8 +------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/iscsi_ibft.c b/drivers/firmware/iscsi_ibft.c > index 2dd1fbb8cccc..81037e5fe301 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/iscsi_ibft.c > +++ b/drivers/firmware/iscsi_ibft.c > @@ -464,14 +464,8 @@ static umode_t ibft_check_nic_for(void *data, int type) > rc = S_IRUGO; > break; > case ISCSI_BOOT_ETH_PREFIX_LEN: > - if (nic->subnet_mask_prefix) > - rc = S_IRUGO; > - break; > case ISCSI_BOOT_ETH_SUBNET_MASK: > - if (!memcmp(nic->ip_addr, nulls, 10) && > - (nic->ip_addr[10] == 0xff) && > - (nic->ip_addr[11] == 0xff) && > - nic->subnet_mask_prefix) > + if (nic->subnet_mask_prefix) > rc = S_IRUGO; > break; > case ISCSI_BOOT_ETH_ORIGIN: >
Sorry. I thought I sent this mail already. Is the commit id above supposed to be referencing the first patch? I could not match it to anything. If so, then shouldn't this patch just be combined with the second patch and some comment about us always displaying it for compat reasons added to the code? Also, you should normally cc Konrad for iscsi_ibft.c patches, because he is actually the maintainer. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
