So, just reverted this patch.

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 06:59:23AM +0800, tom.t...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Tom Yan <tom.t...@gmail.com>
> 
> Commit 7780081c1f04 ("libata-scsi: Set information sense field for
> invalid parameter") changed how ata_mselect_*() make sure read-only
> bits are not modified. The new implementation introduced a bug that
> the read-only bits in the byte that has a changeable bit will not
> be checked.
> 
> Added the necessary check, with comments explaining the heuristic.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Yan <tom.t...@gmail.com>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> index 06afe63..b47c3ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> @@ -3617,8 +3617,18 @@ static int ata_mselect_caching(struct ata_queued_cmd 
> *qc,
>        */
>       ata_msense_caching(dev->id, mpage, false);
>       for (i = 0; i < CACHE_MPAGE_LEN - 2; i++) {
> -             if (i == 0)
> -                     continue;
> +             /* Check the first byte */
> +             if (i == 0) {
> +                     /* except the WCE bit */
> +                     if (mpage[i + 2] & 0xfb != buf[i] & 0xfb) {

This not only triggered compiler warning but is actually wrong.  The
above is

        mpage[i + 1] & (0xfb != buf[i]) & 0xfb

which is non-sensical.  So, this patch wasn't tested at all.  Not even
compile test.  Please don't do this.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to