On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 08:29:20PM +0000, Don Brace wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Johannes Thumshirn [mailto:jthumsh...@suse.de]
[...]
>
> The reason is that we want it run immediately (or close to immediately).
>
> The code could be restructured to avoid calling this function with a 0, but
> it would result in more code and no benefit.
OK, now I'm not sure if we talked past each other. I didn't mean
"don't call schedule_delayed_work() with a delay of 0" but "why aren't
you using schedule_work() instead". But maybe it's just too early in
the morning and I didn't have enough coffee yet.
Thanks,
Johannes
--
Johannes Thumshirn Storage
jthumsh...@suse.de +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
