On 1/18/2017 1:50 AM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
@@ -4959,11 +4968,11 @@ lpfc_send_taskmgmt(struct lpfc_vport *vport, struct
scsi_cmnd *cmnd,
int status;
rdata = lpfc_rport_data_from_scsi_device(cmnd->device);
- if (!rdata || !rdata->pnode || !NLP_CHK_NODE_ACT(rdata->pnode))
- return FAILED;
OK, I don't get this hunk. lpfc_rport_data_from_scsi_device() cannot return
NULL anymore?
I at least expected something like:
rdata = lpfc_rport_data_from_scsi_device(cmnd->device);
if (!rdata || !rdata->pnode)
return FAILED;
pnode = rdata->pnode;
if (!NLP_CHK_NODE_ACT(pnode)
return FAILED;
it can and the order of precedence for the if check allows for it. I
don't see any difference in what you wrote vs what's there, other than
pnode gets an assignment.
Agree with all your other comments and will address them.
-- james
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
