On 01/31/2017 02:22 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:25:58AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> Enable lockless command submission for scsi-mq by moving the
>> command structure into the payload for struct request.
>
> We support cmd_size for both the mq and !mq code path, so this
> could be simplified by always taking your new block-mq path.
>
Yes, they are with your latest patchset.
But that sort of overlapped with my patches and is hasn't been merged
yet. So I haven't integrated that.
So what is the status?
Should I rebase my patch on top of those patches?
>> 4 files changed, 427 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>
> The amount of new code scare me. Especially compared to the very
> short changelog.
>
Well, these are mainly duplicated code paths as I left the original code
in place.
Simply because the infrastructure is very much in flux and converting it
all in one go might be giving negative results :-)
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
>> b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
>> index 942fb7e..29e139f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
>> @@ -867,6 +867,20 @@ struct scsiio_tracker *
>> {
>> WARN_ON(!smid);
>> WARN_ON(smid >= ioc->hi_priority_smid);
>> + if (shost_use_blk_mq(ioc->shost)) {
>> + u16 hwq = (smid - 1) % ioc->shost->nr_hw_queues;
>> + u16 tag = (smid - 1) / ioc->shost->nr_hw_queues;
>> + struct blk_mq_tag_set *tagset = &ioc->shost->tag_set;
>> + struct request *req;
>> +
>> + req = blk_mq_tag_to_rq(tagset->tags[hwq], tag);
>> + if (req) {
>> + struct scsi_cmnd *cmd = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
>> +
>> + return scsi_cmd_priv(cmd);
>> + } else
>> + return NULL;
>> + }
>
> This looks like it basically duplicates scsi_host_find_tag().
>
Yes, but scsi_host_find_tag() still relies on req->special, which it
really shouldn't after your patches; scsi_cmd_priv() should be used there.
I got a patch series to remove the last vestigies from using ->special
in the SCSI midlayer; probably time to post it.
>> + if (shost_use_blk_mq(ioc->shost)) {
>> + unsigned int unique_tag = blk_mq_unique_tag(scmd->request);
>> + u16 hwq = blk_mq_unique_tag_to_hwq(unique_tag);
>> + u16 tag = blk_mq_unique_tag_to_tag(unique_tag);
>> + u16 smid = (tag * ioc->shost->nr_hw_queues) + hwq + 1;
>> +
>> + request = scsi_cmd_priv(scmd);
>> + request->scmd = scmd;
>
> no need for a backpointer, blk_mq_rq_from_pdu gets your
> back to the request, and scsi_cmd_priv back to driver private data.
>
I know. Compability with original code only.
>> + request->cb_idx = cb_idx;
>> + request->msix_io = hwq;
>> + request->smid = smid;
>
> why do we need to store the smid?
>
Sanity checking.
Far too many instances where I got the tag <-> smid mapping wrong during
development.
But yeah, if we move the entire driver over and rip out the original
code path this can go.
>> @@ -562,12 +642,7 @@ enum block_state {
>> _ctl_set_task_mid(struct MPT3SAS_ADAPTER *ioc, struct mpt3_ioctl_command
>> *karg,
>
> I think this function just needs to go away instantly.
> Trying to send task management requests from userspace for any
> active smid is plain dangerous.
>
Hey, I didn't to it. I just did the conversion.
But indeed, it's of questionable value.
I can remove it with the next iteration.
So, I'm happy to rebase it on top of your BLOCK_PC changes. Just tell me
which tree to use.
Then indeed most of the duplicate code-paths could go away.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking
h...@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
