> On 03/06/2017 03:21 PM, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
> > refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
> > situations.
> 
> The subject is wrong, should be something like "scsi: libfc convert
> fc_fcp_pkt.ref_cnt from atomic_t to refcount_t" but not s390.
> 
> Other than that
> Acked-by: Johannes Thumshirn <j...@kernel.org>

Turns out that it is better that all these patches go through the respective 
maintainer trees, if present. 
If I send an updated patch (with subject fixed), could you merge it through 
your tree?

Best Regards,
Elena.
> 
> --
> Johannes Thumshirn                                          Storage
> jthumsh...@suse.de                                +49 911 74053 689
> SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
> GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
> HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
> Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850

Reply via email to