On 03/09/2017 10:26 AM, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
>
>> On 03/09/2017 08:18 AM, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:21:09PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote:
>>>>> refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
>>>>> used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
>>>>> a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
>>>>> refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
>>>>> situations.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshet...@intel.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Hans Liljestrand <ishkam...@gmail.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: David Windsor <dwind...@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> This looks OK to me.
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Chris Leech <cle...@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> Thank you for review! Do you have a tree that can take this change?
>>
>> Hi Elena,
>>
>> iscsi like fcoe should go via the SCSI tree.
>
> Thanks Johannes! Should I resend with "Acked-by" added in order for it to be
> picked up?
Yes I think this would be a good way to go.
Byte,
Johannes
--
Johannes Thumshirn Storage
jthumsh...@suse.de +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
