On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 13:40 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
> 
> There's no need to use the static UTS_RELEASE string, since
> utsname()->release contains the same.
> 
> This avoids rebuilding this file for every change of the
> release string.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/tcm_qla2xxx.c | 13 ++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/tcm_qla2xxx.c 
> b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/tcm_qla2xxx.c
> index 7443e4efa3ae..9195e00261f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/tcm_qla2xxx.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/tcm_qla2xxx.c
> @@ -25,7 +25,6 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
> -#include <generated/utsrelease.h>
>  #include <linux/utsname.h>
>  #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
> @@ -1870,9 +1869,9 @@ static ssize_t tcm_qla2xxx_wwn_version_show(struct 
> config_item *item,
>               char *page)
>  {
>       return sprintf(page,
> -         "TCM QLOGIC QLA2XXX NPIV capable fabric module %s on %s/%s on "
> -         UTS_RELEASE"\n", QLA2XXX_VERSION, utsname()->sysname,
> -         utsname()->machine);
> +         "TCM QLOGIC QLA2XXX NPIV capable fabric module %s on %s/%s on %s\n",
> +         QLA2XXX_VERSION, utsname()->sysname,
> +         utsname()->machine, utsname()->release);
>  }
>  
>  CONFIGFS_ATTR_RO(tcm_qla2xxx_wwn_, version);
> @@ -1976,9 +1975,9 @@ static int tcm_qla2xxx_register_configfs(void)
>  {
>       int ret;
>  
> -     pr_debug("TCM QLOGIC QLA2XXX fabric module %s on %s/%s on "
> -         UTS_RELEASE"\n", QLA2XXX_VERSION, utsname()->sysname,
> -         utsname()->machine);
> +     pr_debug("TCM QLOGIC QLA2XXX fabric module %s on %s/%s on %s\n",
> +         QLA2XXX_VERSION, utsname()->sysname,
> +         utsname()->machine, utsname()->release);
>  
>       ret = target_register_template(&tcm_qla2xxx_ops);
>       if (ret)

Hello Johannes,

Although this patch looks fine to me, I think removing the UTS release 
information
from the output entirely would be even better. I think including that 
information
in the output only made sense before LIO went upstream.

Bart.

Reply via email to