Since struct bsg_command is now used in every calling case, we don't
need separation of arguments anymore that are contained in the same
bsg_command.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Block <bbl...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
block/bsg.c | 13 ++++++-------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/bsg.c b/block/bsg.c
index 8517361a9b3f..6ee2ffca808a 100644
--- a/block/bsg.c
+++ b/block/bsg.c
@@ -212,11 +212,12 @@ bsg_validate_sgv4_hdr(struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, int *op)
* map sg_io_v4 to a request.
*/
static struct request *
-bsg_map_hdr(struct bsg_device *bd, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, fmode_t
has_write_perm,
- u8 *reply_buffer)
+bsg_map_hdr(struct bsg_device *bd, struct bsg_command *bc,
+ fmode_t has_write_perm)
{
struct request_queue *q = bd->queue;
struct request *rq, *next_rq = NULL;
+ struct sg_io_v4 *hdr = &bc->hdr;
int ret;
unsigned int op, dxfer_len;
void __user *dxferp = NULL;
@@ -244,7 +245,7 @@ bsg_map_hdr(struct bsg_device *bd, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr,
fmode_t has_write_perm,
if (IS_ERR(rq))
return rq;
- ret = blk_fill_sgv4_hdr_rq(q, rq, hdr, bd, reply_buffer,
+ ret = blk_fill_sgv4_hdr_rq(q, rq, hdr, bd, bc->reply_buffer,
has_write_perm);
if (ret)
goto out;
@@ -633,8 +634,7 @@ static int __bsg_write(struct bsg_device *bd, const char
__user *buf,
/*
* get a request, fill in the blanks, and add to request queue
*/
- rq = bsg_map_hdr(bd, &bc->hdr, has_write_perm,
- bc->reply_buffer);
+ rq = bsg_map_hdr(bd, bc, has_write_perm);
if (IS_ERR(rq)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(rq);
rq = NULL;
@@ -934,8 +934,7 @@ static long bsg_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
unsigned long arg)
goto sg_io_out;
}
- bc->rq = bsg_map_hdr(bd, &bc->hdr, file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE,
- bc->reply_buffer);
+ bc->rq = bsg_map_hdr(bd, bc, file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE);
if (IS_ERR(bc->rq)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(bc->rq);
goto sg_io_out;
--
2.12.2
