On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 17:35 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I looked a bit more at the history of this, and it seems like the only > issue with commit 17d5363b83f8 here is using the blk_status_t type for the > ret variable. Even before that the negative error code leaked out > to userspace. We can try to just turn that back into an int, but I'll > also send out an RFC patch to use bsg-lib for the SAS transport in a bit.
Hello Christoph, Do you want me to split this patch in two patches - one that changes the type of 'ret' and another one that translates the Unix error code into a SCSI result? Thanks, Bart.
