On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 09:39:18PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 14:26 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 01:46:13PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > A common pattern in RCU code is to assign a new value to an RCU
> > > pointer after having read and stored the old value. Introduce a
> > > macro for this pattern.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanass...@wdc.com>
> > > Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
> > > Cc: Hannes Reinecke <h...@suse.de>
> > > Cc: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumsh...@suse.de>
> > > Cc: Shane M Seymour <shane.seym...@hpe.com>
> > > ---
> > > include/linux/rcupdate.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > > index f816fc72b51e..555815ce2e57 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > > @@ -561,6 +561,26 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_sleep_check(void) { }
> > > */
> > > #define rcu_pointer_handoff(p) (p)
> > >
> > > +/**
> > > + * rcu_swap_protected() - swap an RCU and a regular pointer
> > > + * @rcu_ptr: RCU pointer
> > > + * @ptr: regular pointer
> > > + * @c: the conditions under which the dereference will take place
> > > + *
> > > + * Perform swap(@rcu_ptr, @ptr) where @rcu_ptr is an RCU-annotated
> > > pointer and
> > > + * @c is the argument that is passed to the rcu_dereference_protected()
> > > call
> > > + * used to read that pointer.
> > > + */
> > > +#define rcu_swap_protected(rcu_ptr, ptr, c) do { \
> > > + typeof(ptr) __tmp; \
> > > + \
> > > + BUILD_BUG_ON(!__same_type(typeof(rcu_ptr), typeof(*(ptr)) __rcu *)); \
> > > + BUILD_BUG_ON(!__same_type(typeof(ptr), typeof(*(rcu_ptr)) *)); \
> >
> > Hmmm...
> >
> > What kinds of bugs have these two BUILD_BUG_ON() instances have caught
> > that would not be caught by the assignments below?
>
> Hello Paul,
>
> These two BUILD_BUG_ON() statements can be left out. The purpose of these
> statements is to complain as early as possible if the type of rcu_ptr and/or
> ptr is incorrect. As we all know error messages that are triggered by macros
> used inside a macro definition can be hard to read. My hope is that these
> two BUILD_BUG_ON() macros will cause the compiler to report easier to read
> diagnostic messages.
>
> > > + __tmp = rcu_dereference_protected((rcu_ptr), (c)); \
> > > + rcu_assign_pointer((rcu_ptr), (ptr)); \
> > > + (ptr) = __tmp; \
> > > +} while (0)
> > > +
> >
> > Could you please put this after rcu_assign_pointer() and before
> > rcu_access_pointer()? That way the things that assign to RCU-protected
> > pointers are together.
>
> Something like the patch below (compile-tested only)?
Looks good!
I suspect that you would like to push this with your changes, so,
assuming 0day test robot and -next are OK with it:
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
I am not necessarily inalterably opposed to the extra BUILD_BUG_ON()
statements, and in fact I do like improved diagnostics, but those need to
go up via my tree as a separate patch. That way, any unexpected gotchas
can be handled without risking your rcu_swap_protected() functionality.
Thanx, Paul
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
>
>
> [PATCH] rcu: Introduce rcu_swap_protected()
> ---
> include/linux/rcupdate.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> index f816fc72b51e..8e920f0ecb07 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> @@ -407,6 +407,22 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_sleep_check(void) { }
> _r_a_p__v; \
> })
>
> +/**
> + * rcu_swap_protected() - swap an RCU and a regular pointer
> + * @rcu_ptr: RCU pointer
> + * @ptr: regular pointer
> + * @c: the conditions under which the dereference will take place
> + *
> + * Perform swap(@rcu_ptr, @ptr) where @rcu_ptr is an RCU-annotated pointer
> and
> + * @c is the argument that is passed to the rcu_dereference_protected() call
> + * used to read that pointer.
> + */
> +#define rcu_swap_protected(rcu_ptr, ptr, c) do { \
> + typeof(ptr) __tmp = rcu_dereference_protected((rcu_ptr), (c)); \
> + rcu_assign_pointer((rcu_ptr), (ptr)); \
> + (ptr) = __tmp; \
> +} while (0)
> +
> /**
> * rcu_access_pointer() - fetch RCU pointer with no dereferencing
> * @p: The pointer to read
