Hi,

Ok, will do. Thanks !

Romain

2018-01-03 22:34 GMT+01:00 Bjorn Helgaas <helg...@kernel.org>:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 04:17:24PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 06:53:52PM +0100, Romain Perier wrote:
>> > The current PCI pool API are simple macro functions direct expanded to
>> > the appropriate dma pool functions. The prototypes are almost the same
>> > and semantically, they are very similar. I propose to use the DMA pool
>> > API directly and get rid of the old API.
>> >
>> > This set of patches, replaces the old API by the dma pool API
>> > and remove the defines.
>> > ...
>>
>> > Romain Perier (4):
>> >   block: DAC960: Replace PCI pool old API
>> >   net: e100: Replace PCI pool old API
>> >   hinic: Replace PCI pool old API
>> >   PCI: Remove PCI pool macro functions
>> >
>> >  drivers/block/DAC960.c                            | 38 
>> > +++++++++++------------
>> >  drivers/block/DAC960.h                            |  4 +--
>> >  drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_cmdq.c | 10 +++---
>> >  drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_cmdq.h |  2 +-
>> >  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c                 | 12 +++----
>> >  include/linux/pci.h                               |  9 ------
>> >  6 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>>
>> Applied to pci/misc for v4.16, thanks!
>
> Oops, my mistake.  I can't remove the macros themselves yet because
> some of the uses were removed by patches that were applied via other
> trees, and those patches are not in my tree.
>
> To avoid ordering dependencies during the merge window, I dropped the
> "PCI: Remove PCI pool macro functions" patch.  Please repost that
> after all the removals have made it into Linus' tree.
>
> Bjorn

Reply via email to