Hi Geert,
fine, I'll rely on the base address and the z->rom.er_Type value to
pick the correct config data.
Cheers,
Michael
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 9:06 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Michael Schmitz <schmitz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> OK, in that case I'll need to work out something similar to the test for
>> optional SCSI function on the Blizzard 1230/1260 to find out what board
>> I have when dealing with the duplicate Fastlane/Blizzard1230II ID.
>>
>> Is the board base address as returned by zorro_resource_start() reliable
>> to distinguish between Zorro II and Zorro III boards?
>
> The board base address is assigned by AmigaOS based on the values in the
> Expansion ROM (mainly ExpansionRom.er_Type) on the board.
> More specifically, AmigaOS creates struct ConfigDev from struct ExpansionRom.
> So yes, it must be reliable.
>
>> Am 06.03.2018 um 20:43 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
>>> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 2:11 AM, Michael Schmitz <schmitz...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Index 1 should have been ZORRO_PROD_PHASE5_CYBERSTORM_MK_II, I've
>>>> corrected that in the meantime.
>>>>
>>>> Fastlane / Blizzard 1230_II distinction is something I an not quite
>>>> sure about - does the probe function get called twice if the device
>>>> table contains the same ID twice but with different driver_data
>>>> contents?
>>>
>>> No, the probe function gets called on the first match only.
>>> Cfr. drivers/zorro/zorro-driver.c:zorro_device_probe().
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 --
> ge...@linux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like
> that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
