Johannes, can you take a look at this? You are one of the few persons who cared about SMP passthrough in the recent past.
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 04:52:37PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > All three instance of ->smp_handler deal with highmem backed requests > just fine. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de> > --- > drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c | 4 ---- > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c > b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c > index 08acbabfae07..a22baf206071 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c > @@ -223,10 +223,6 @@ static int sas_bsg_initialize(struct Scsi_Host *shost, > struct sas_rphy *rphy) > to_sas_host_attrs(shost)->q = q; > } > > - /* > - * by default assume old behaviour and bounce for any highmem page > - */ > - blk_queue_bounce_limit(q, BLK_BOUNCE_HIGH); > blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_BIDI, q); > return 0; > } > -- > 2.17.0 ---end quoted text---
