On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 09:46:52PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> FWIW, here is my semantic patch and the output - it reports on things that
> appear to be too small and things that it doesn't know about.
>
> What are the relevant pci wrappers? I didn't find them.
Basically all of the functions in include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h
> too small: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:1138: 30
> too small: drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/dma.c:1068: 30
> unknown: sound/pci/ctxfi/cthw20k2.c:2033: DMA_BIT_MASK(dma_bits)
> unknown: sound/pci/ctxfi/cthw20k2.c:2034: DMA_BIT_MASK(dma_bits)
This one's good:
const unsigned int dma_bits = BITS_PER_LONG;
> unknown: drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c:6036: consistent_mask
and this one:
consistent_mask = (instance->adapter_type == VENTURA_SERIES) ?
DMA_BIT_MASK(64) : DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
> unknown: drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/txrx.c:200:
> DMA_BIT_MASK(wil->dma_addr_size)
if (wil->dma_addr_size > 32)
dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev,
DMA_BIT_MASK(wil->dma_addr_size));
> unknown: drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_main.c:452:
> DMA_BIT_MASK(NFP_NET_MAX_DMA_BITS)
drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net.h:#define NFP_NET_MAX_DMA_BITS
40
> unknown: drivers/gpu/host1x/dev.c:199: host->info->dma_mask
Looks safe ...
drivers/gpu/host1x/bus.c: device->dev.coherent_dma_mask =
host1x->dev->coherent_dma_mask;
drivers/gpu/host1x/bus.c: device->dev.dma_mask =
&device->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
drivers/gpu/host1x/dev.c: .dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
drivers/gpu/host1x/dev.c: .dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
drivers/gpu/host1x/dev.c: .dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(34),
drivers/gpu/host1x/dev.c: .dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(34),
drivers/gpu/host1x/dev.c: .dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(34),
drivers/gpu/host1x/dev.c: dma_set_mask_and_coherent(host->dev,
host->info->dma_mask);
drivers/gpu/host1x/dev.h: u64 dma_mask; /* mask of addressable memory */
... but that reminds us that maybe some drivers aren't using dma_set_mask()
but rather touching dma_mask directly.
... 57 more to look at ...
