On 2018-10-16 10:38 a.m., Jens Axboe wrote:
We just need to free the request here. Additionally, this is
currently wrong for a queue that's using MQ currently, it'll
crash.
Surprise removals are difficult code paths to check. That snippet
is after the request has been generated and before the call to:
blk_execute_rq_nowait()
IOWs a small window.
Currently if a surprise removal is detected by the completion
callback (sg_rq_end_io() ) then a pr_info() is called and it
otherwise follows the main path out: free-ing the request,
keeping the bio. Is that okay?
More generally, once a request is "in flight" and a surprise
removal occurs, can the sg driver expect the block layer (or
scsi mid-level) to react (and clean-up) or is it up to the
sg driver to force those actions?
Acked-by: Douglas Gilbert <dgilb...@interlog.com>
Cc: Doug Gilbert <dgilb...@interlog.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <ax...@kernel.dk>
---
drivers/scsi/sg.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sg.c b/drivers/scsi/sg.c
index 8a254bb46a9b..c6ad00703c5b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sg.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sg.c
@@ -822,7 +822,7 @@ sg_common_write(Sg_fd * sfp, Sg_request * srp,
if (atomic_read(&sdp->detaching)) {
if (srp->bio) {
scsi_req_free_cmd(scsi_req(srp->rq));
- blk_end_request_all(srp->rq, BLK_STS_IOERR);
+ blk_put_request(srp->rq);
srp->rq = NULL;
}
