Hi, Friendly ping:
Who can ack or review this patch, please? Thanks -- Gustavo On 11/27/18 10:27 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that, in this particular case, I replaced "!!! fall through !!!" comment with "fall through" annotations, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 146155 ("Missing break in switch") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gust...@embeddedor.com> --- drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc.c | 9 +++------ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc.c b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc.c index 16d3aeb0e572..32b24e51cce6 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc.c @@ -978,9 +978,7 @@ bfa_iocpf_sm_enabling(struct bfa_iocpf_s *iocpf, enum iocpf_event event)case IOCPF_E_INITFAIL:bfa_iocpf_timer_stop(ioc); - /* - * !!! fall through !!! - */ + /* fall through */case IOCPF_E_TIMEOUT:writel(1, ioc->ioc_regs.ioc_sem_reg); @@ -1056,9 +1054,7 @@ bfa_iocpf_sm_disabling(struct bfa_iocpf_s *iocpf, enum iocpf_event event)case IOCPF_E_FAIL:bfa_iocpf_timer_stop(ioc); - /* - * !!! fall through !!! - */ + /* fall through */case IOCPF_E_TIMEOUT:bfa_ioc_set_cur_ioc_fwstate(ioc, BFI_IOC_FAIL); @@ -6007,6 +6003,7 @@ bfa_dconf_sm_final_sync(struct bfa_dconf_mod_s *dconf, case BFA_DCONF_SM_IOCDISABLE: case BFA_DCONF_SM_FLASH_COMP: bfa_timer_stop(&dconf->timer); + /* fall through */ case BFA_DCONF_SM_TIMEOUT: bfa_sm_set_state(dconf, bfa_dconf_sm_uninit); bfa_fsm_send_event(&dconf->bfa->iocfc, IOCFC_E_DCONF_DONE);
