Hi,
Friendly ping:
Who can ack or review this patch, please?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 11/27/18 10:30 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that, in this particular case, a dash is added as a token in
order to separate the "Fall through" annotation from the rest of the
comment on the same line, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gust...@embeddedor.com>
---
drivers/scsi/isci/request.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/isci/request.c b/drivers/scsi/isci/request.c
index 2f151708b59a..1b18cf55167e 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/isci/request.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/isci/request.c
@@ -894,7 +894,7 @@ sci_io_request_terminate(struct isci_request *ireq)
* and don't wait for the task response.
*/
sci_change_state(&ireq->sm, SCI_REQ_ABORTING);
- /* Fall through and handle like ABORTING... */
+ /* Fall through - and handle like ABORTING... */
case SCI_REQ_ABORTING:
if (!isci_remote_device_is_safe_to_abort(ireq->target_device))
set_bit(IREQ_PENDING_ABORT, &ireq->flags);
