Hi, Friendly ping:
Who can ack or review this patch, please? Thanks -- Gustavo On 11/27/18 10:30 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that, in this particular case, a dash is added as a token in order to separate the "fall through" annotations from the rest of the comment on the same line, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gust...@embeddedor.com> --- drivers/scsi/isci/remote_device.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/isci/remote_device.c b/drivers/scsi/isci/remote_device.c index cc51f38b116d..9d29edb9f590 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/isci/remote_device.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/isci/remote_device.c @@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ static void isci_remote_device_not_ready(struct isci_host *ihost, /* Kill all outstanding requests for the device. */ sci_remote_device_terminate_requests(idev);- /* Fall through into the default case... */+ /* Fall through - into the default case... */ default: clear_bit(IDEV_IO_READY, &idev->flags); break; @@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ enum sci_status sci_remote_device_event_handler(struct isci_remote_device *idev,break;} - /* Else, fall through and treat as unhandled... */ + /* fall through - and treat as unhandled... */ default: dev_dbg(scirdev_to_dev(idev), "%s: device: %p event code: %x: %s\n",
