No one can totally imitate the real world. That is why the first release of software has a lot of bugs :-) To satify your curiosity, copy is done on real machines, with the whole directory, reproducible. The hardware of SCSI is better than IDE. I don't want to invest 2000 DPT to a XT :-) Leonard On Mon, 7 Dec 1998, Robert Minichino wrote: > > > > I think currently spinning SCSI hard disks on the world, either in > servers > > > > or workstation, either in Unix/Linux or NT, is 50-pin old guys, no DPT > disk > > > > > > And as my stats showed for real work even old 5400 rpm fast scsi on a > > > now discontinued adapter (the BT946) beats current UDMA IDE for real > world > > > compiles. You "think". I've "measured" > > > > > > > Open server 5.0.4p, DPT RAID-1, 32 MB cache, PCI, 4.2 GB (A cable) > > > > copy 9,177 K in 9 seconds. > > > > Red hat 4.2, 8 GB IDE > > > > copy 9,397 K in 2 seconds. > > > > both run in shell script. > > And many tape streamers are good at bulk transfer, too. Besides that, there > is not nearly enough information here to conclude anything about either > configuration. Are both operating systems run on the same system? Where are > the partitions located on the disk (data transfer rates are different > depending upon the track)? What are the specifications on the drives? Was > the cache clean? What was the filesystem used on each OS? Was the > filesystem set to do synchronous writes? Was the DPT cache written through? > How much RAM was in each system? What was the processor speed on each > system? Is the test reproducible? > > For a more accurate measure of disk throughput, grab Bonnie from > http://www.textuality.com/bonnie/ and run with a file size of three times > either the physical RAM size or controller cache size, whichever is greater. > Post those results, along with the answers to the questions above, and then > you might have a case. Or time some reproducable real-life tasks on setups > that differ only in the drives/controller used. > > -- > Robert Minichino > Chief Engineer > Denarius Enterprises, Inc. > http://www.denarius.com/ > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dumb question: Which is "better" SCSI or IDE disks?
Leonard Zhang System Administrator ISD RVIB Tue, 8 Dec 1998 03:03:36 -0500
- Re: Dumb question: Which is &q... Robert Minichino
- Re: Dumb question: Which ... Leonard Zhang System Administrator ISD RVIB
- Re: Dumb question: Which is &q... David
- Re: Dumb question: Which ... Leonard Zhang System Administrator ISD RVIB
- Re: Dumb question: Wh... David
- Re: Dumb question: Which ... Leonard Zhang System Administrator ISD RVIB
- Re: Dumb question: Which is &q... Marc SCHAEFER
- Re: Dumb question: Which is &q... Leonard Zhang System Administrator ISD RVIB
- Re: Dumb question: Which is &q... Leonard Zhang System Administrator ISD RVIB
- Re: Dumb question: Which is &q... Robert Minichino
- Re: Dumb question: Which ... Leonard Zhang System Administrator ISD RVIB
- Re: Dumb question: Wh... David
- Re: Dumb question: Which is &q... Brian Geisel
- Re: Dumb question: Which is &q... Marc SCHAEFER
- Re: Dumb question: Which is &q... Robert Minichino
- Re: Dumb question: Which is &q... Louis Mandelstam
- Re: Dumb question: Which is &q... Chiaki Ishikawa
- Re: Dumb question: Which ... Steve Austin
- Re: Dumb question: Which is &q... Robert Minichino
- Re: Dumb question: Which is &q... C S Hendrix
- Re: Dumb question: Which ... Maxim Surdu
