In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Maxim Surdu writes:
> The performance of wide SCSI drives is not so different from narrow/fast SCSI
> as it mostly depends of RPM speed and thus your fast/narrow drives have
> almost
> the same performance as your wide Hawk (Hawk is slow 5400 rpm drive).
Probably true. I just happened to remember that my external narrow
drive is a Seagate Elite A/V drive so it is pretty fast. I just
thought given roughly the same speed I should expect block transfers
to be faster.
It is possible that a side benefit is less time on the bus by the wide
drives.
--
Shannon - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - InfiNet?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Microsoft should switch to the vacuum cleaner business where people
actually want products that suck." -- Bruno Bratti (i think)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
