> > 
> > But this thread started out with comparisons to Solaris, and frankly, Solaris
> > (out of the box) isn't in any better shape than Linux is (which I pointed out)
> > with respect to FC midlayer stuff, or storage management (with the default end
> > user product). It's only when you add some adult commercial products (like
> > Veritas stuff) that this stuff becomes managable.
> 
> Matt,
> 
> The comparison to Solaris came about because I referenced a SunServer
> article talking about the maturity of Linux and SANs. In fact, the author
> never talked about Solaris, hope I was misleading. 

Well, you were :-)....

> 
> In fact he was positive about LInux in general. I wish I could have posted the 
> article, but as before I couldn't find a URL on their website. 
> 




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to