>What you're seeing there is SAF-TE, not SES. X'ing out the vendor is
amusing-
>given the ID it's set at: it looks like the 2nd GEM chip on a Sun D1000.
Actually, it was an IBM Netfinity 7000M10.
>If there's any interest here in this, I'll finish the ioctl version and
put it
>out there for you to play with. I did some toy management tools for
reporting
>this information- it's in the FreeBSD 4.0 release in /usr/share/examples.
Looks like a circular argument. No SES/SAF-TE Linux support means
the enclosures don't need to implement it. If no enclosures implement it
there is no reason for Linux to support it.
In the implementations I'm famailiar with, each enclosure would be
represented
by a /dev/sesX (x=0,1,2...) device for the monitoring software to play
with.
FWIW,
Steve
(opinions expressed are my own and not those of my current employer)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
