Bill Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Or, is there another kernel somewhere in 2.0.x - 2.2.x that works sweet?
Get a decent SCSI host adaptor (PCI, Symbios, AMD or Tekram based) and
sell that 1542CP.
--
Matthias Andree
Where do you think you're going today?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- aha1542 vs. DAT vs. kernel 2.0.x Bill Jones
- Re: aha1542 vs. DAT vs. kernel 2.0.x Matthias Andree
- Re: aha1542 vs. DAT vs. kernel 2.0.x Alan Cox
- Re: aha1542 vs. DAT vs. kernel 2.0.x Andries Brouwer
- Re: aha1542 vs. DAT vs. kernel 2.0.x Alan Cox
- Re: aha1542 vs. DAT vs. kernel 2.0.x Steven S. Dick
- Re: aha1542 vs. DAT vs. kernel 2... Andries Brouwer
- Re: aha1542 vs. DAT vs. kern... Eric Youngdale
- Re: aha1542 vs. DAT vs. kern... Uncle George
- Re: aha1542 vs. DAT vs. kern... Alan Cox
- Re: aha1542 vs. DAT vs. kern... Eric Youngdale
- Re: aha1542 vs. DAT vs. kern... Matthias Andree
