On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 06:11:30PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> +static inline int
> +nfsd_do_create(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *child, struct vfsmount *mnt,
> + int mode)
> +{
> + struct nameidata nd = {
> + .dentry = child,
> + .mnt = mnt,
> + };
> +
> + return vfs_create(dir, child, mode, &nd);
> +}
> +
Wouldn't it normally result in fewer instructions (on most architectures
... maybe not x86) to keep the same argument order as vfs_create? ie:
static inline int nfsd_do_create(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *child,
int mode, struct vfsmount *mnt)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
