On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:

> >From 3549aced829f84237ddc3ccfa571b8a938cae173 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Serge E. Hallyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:17:45 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] file capabilities: change fE to a bool
> 
> The fE was previously a full capset which was masked with the
> calculated new_permitted to get the process' new effective set.
> It is now a single bit in the xattr.  This patch changes
> bprm->cap_effective to a boolean.  When that boolean is false,
> then P'e is the empty set.  When the boolean is true, then P'e is
> set equal to P'p (new_permitted).  The rationale for this is that
> either the application does not know about capabilities, and
> needs to start with all permitted caps in its effective set, or
> it does know about capabilities, and can start with an empty
> effective set and enable the caps it wants when it wants.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Acked-by: James Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



-- 
James Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to