On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 16:50 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> Add an inet_sys_snd_skb() LSM hook to allow the LSM to provide packet level
> access control for all outbound packets.  Using the existing postroute_last
> netfilter hook turns out to be problematic as it is can be invoked multiple
> times for a single packet, e.g. individual IPsec transforms, adding unwanted
> overhead and complicating the security policy.

None of the netfilter hooks works for this purpose?

Obviously this one needs to get seen on netdev.

> ---
> 
>  include/linux/security.h |   11 +++++++++++
>  net/ipv4/ip_output.c     |    7 +++++++
>  net/ipv6/ip6_output.c    |    5 +++++
>  security/dummy.c         |    8 +++++++-
>  security/security.c      |    6 ++++++
>  5 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
> index db19c92..1b8d332 100644
> --- a/include/linux/security.h
> +++ b/include/linux/security.h
> @@ -876,6 +876,10 @@ struct request_sock;
>   *     Sets the connection's peersid to the secmark on skb.
>   * @req_classify_flow:
>   *   Sets the flow's sid to the openreq sid.
> + * @inet_sys_snd_skb:
> + *   Check permissions on outgoing network packets.
> + *   @skb is the packet to check
> + *   @family is the packet's address family
>   *
>   * Security hooks for XFRM operations.
>   *
> @@ -1416,6 +1420,7 @@ struct security_operations {
>       void (*inet_csk_clone)(struct sock *newsk, const struct request_sock 
> *req);
>       void (*inet_conn_established)(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
>       void (*req_classify_flow)(const struct request_sock *req, struct flowi 
> *fl);
> +     int (*inet_sys_snd_skb)(struct sk_buff *skb, int family);
>  #endif       /* CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK */
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM
> @@ -2328,6 +2333,7 @@ void security_sk_free(struct sock *sk);
>  void security_sk_clone(const struct sock *sk, struct sock *newsk);
>  void security_sk_classify_flow(struct sock *sk, struct flowi *fl);
>  void security_req_classify_flow(const struct request_sock *req, struct flowi 
> *fl);
> +int security_inet_sys_snd_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, int family);
>  void security_sock_graft(struct sock*sk, struct socket *parent);
>  int security_inet_conn_request(struct sock *sk,
>                       struct sk_buff *skb, struct request_sock *req);
> @@ -2471,6 +2477,11 @@ static inline void security_req_classify_flow(const 
> struct request_sock *req, st
>  {
>  }
>  
> +static inline int security_inet_sys_snd_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, int family)
> +{
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static inline void security_sock_graft(struct sock* sk, struct socket 
> *parent)
>  {
>  }
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> index fd99fbd..82a7297 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> @@ -204,6 +204,8 @@ static inline int ip_skb_dst_mtu(struct sk_buff *skb)
>  
>  static int ip_finish_output(struct sk_buff *skb)
>  {
> +     int err;
> +
>  #if defined(CONFIG_NETFILTER) && defined(CONFIG_XFRM)
>       /* Policy lookup after SNAT yielded a new policy */
>       if (skb->dst->xfrm != NULL) {
> @@ -211,6 +213,11 @@ static int ip_finish_output(struct sk_buff *skb)
>               return dst_output(skb);
>       }
>  #endif
> +
> +     err = security_inet_sys_snd_skb(skb, AF_INET);
> +     if (err)
> +             return err;
> +
>       if (skb->len > ip_skb_dst_mtu(skb) && !skb_is_gso(skb))
>               return ip_fragment(skb, ip_finish_output2);
>       else
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
> index 6338a9c..44ddf32 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
> @@ -72,8 +72,13 @@ static __inline__ void ipv6_select_ident(struct sk_buff 
> *skb, struct frag_hdr *f
>  
>  static int ip6_output_finish(struct sk_buff *skb)
>  {
> +     int err;
>       struct dst_entry *dst = skb->dst;
>  
> +     err = security_inet_sys_snd_skb(skb, AF_INET6);
> +     if (err)
> +             return err;
> +
>       if (dst->hh)
>               return neigh_hh_output(dst->hh, skb);
>       else if (dst->neighbour)
> diff --git a/security/dummy.c b/security/dummy.c
> index 0b62f95..384979a 100644
> --- a/security/dummy.c
> +++ b/security/dummy.c
> @@ -848,6 +848,11 @@ static inline void dummy_req_classify_flow(const struct 
> request_sock *req,
>                       struct flowi *fl)
>  {
>  }
> +
> +static inline int dummy_inet_sys_snd_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, int family)
> +{
> +     return 0;
> +}
>  #endif       /* CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK */
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM
> @@ -1122,7 +1127,8 @@ void security_fixup_ops (struct security_operations 
> *ops)
>       set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, inet_csk_clone);
>       set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, inet_conn_established);
>       set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, req_classify_flow);
> - #endif      /* CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK */
> +     set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, inet_sys_snd_skb);
> +#endif       /* CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK */
>  #ifdef  CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM
>       set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, xfrm_policy_alloc_security);
>       set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, xfrm_policy_clone_security);
> diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
> index 3bdcada..7f55459 100644
> --- a/security/security.c
> +++ b/security/security.c
> @@ -961,6 +961,12 @@ void security_req_classify_flow(const struct 
> request_sock *req, struct flowi *fl
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_req_classify_flow);
>  
> +int security_inet_sys_snd_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, int family)
> +{
> +     return security_ops->inet_sys_snd_skb(skb, family);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_inet_sys_snd_skb);
> +
>  void security_sock_graft(struct sock *sk, struct socket *parent)
>  {
>       security_ops->sock_graft(sk, parent);
> 
> 
> --
> This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
> If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
-- 
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to