Here is another version of the patch queue to make gfs2 and similar file systems work with SELinux. As suggested by Stephen Smalley [*], the relevant uses of inode->security are wrapped in function calls that try to revalidate invalid labels.
[*] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=144416710207686&w=2 The patches are looking good from my point of view; is there anything else that needs addressing? Does SELinux have test suites that these patches could be tested agains? Thanks, Andreas Andreas Gruenbacher (7): selinux: Remove unused variable in selinux_inode_init_security selinux: Add accessor functions for inode->i_security selinux: Get rid of file_path_has_perm selinux: Push dentry down from {dentry,path,file}_has_perm security: Add hook to invalidate inode security labels selinux: Revalidate invalid inode security labels gfs2: Invalide security labels of inodes when they go invalid fs/gfs2/glops.c | 2 + include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 6 ++ include/linux/security.h | 5 + security/security.c | 8 ++ security/selinux/hooks.c | 213 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- security/selinux/include/objsec.h | 6 ++ 6 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-) -- 2.5.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
