On 10/27/2015 04:48 PM, Andrew Perepechko wrote:
Make validatetrans decisions available through selinuxfs.
"/validatetrans" is added to selinuxfs for this purpose.
This functionality is needed by file system servers
implemented in userspace or kernelspace without the VFS
layer.

Writing "$oldcontext $newcontext $tclass $taskcontext"
to /validatetrans is expected to return 0 if the transition
is allowed and -EPERM otherwise.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Perepechko <anser...@ya.ru>
CC: andrew.perepec...@seagate.com
---
  security/selinux/include/classmap.h |    2 +-
  security/selinux/include/security.h |    3 +
  security/selinux/selinuxfs.c        |   79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  security/selinux/ss/services.c      |   41 ++++++++++++++----
  4 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/selinux/include/classmap.h 
b/security/selinux/include/classmap.h
index 5a4eef5..ef83c4b 100644
--- a/security/selinux/include/classmap.h
+++ b/security/selinux/include/classmap.h
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ struct security_class_mapping secclass_map[] = {
          { "compute_av", "compute_create", "compute_member",
            "check_context", "load_policy", "compute_relabel",
            "compute_user", "setenforce", "setbool", "setsecparam",
-           "setcheckreqprot", "read_policy", NULL } },
+           "setcheckreqprot", "read_policy", "validate_trans", NULL } },
        { "process",
          { "fork", "transition", "sigchld", "sigkill",
            "sigstop", "signull", "signal", "ptrace", "getsched", "setsched",
diff --git a/security/selinux/include/security.h 
b/security/selinux/include/security.h
index 223e9fd..38feb55 100644
--- a/security/selinux/include/security.h
+++ b/security/selinux/include/security.h
@@ -187,6 +187,9 @@ int security_node_sid(u16 domain, void *addr, u32 addrlen,
  int security_validate_transition(u32 oldsid, u32 newsid, u32 tasksid,
                                 u16 tclass);

+int security_validate_transition_user(u32 oldsid, u32 newsid, u32 tasksid,
+                                     u16 tclass);
+
  int security_bounded_transition(u32 oldsid, u32 newsid);

  int security_sid_mls_copy(u32 sid, u32 mls_sid, u32 *new_sid);
diff --git a/security/selinux/selinuxfs.c b/security/selinux/selinuxfs.c
index c02da25..e460b4e 100644
--- a/security/selinux/selinuxfs.c
+++ b/security/selinux/selinuxfs.c
@@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ enum sel_inos {
        SEL_DENY_UNKNOWN, /* export unknown deny handling to userspace */
        SEL_STATUS,     /* export current status using mmap() */
        SEL_POLICY,     /* allow userspace to read the in kernel policy */
+       SEL_VALIDATE_TRANS, /* compute validatetrans decision */
        SEL_INO_NEXT,   /* The next inode number to use */
  };

@@ -653,6 +654,83 @@ static const struct file_operations sel_checkreqprot_ops = 
{
        .llseek         = generic_file_llseek,
  };

+static ssize_t sel_write_validatetrans(struct file *file,
+                                       const char __user *buf,
+                                       size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
+{
+       char *oldcon = NULL, *newcon = NULL, *taskcon = NULL;
+       char *req = NULL;
+       u32 osid, nsid, tsid;
+       u16 tclass;
+       int rc;
+
+       rc = task_has_security(current, SECURITY__VALIDATE_TRANS);
+       if (rc)
+               goto out;
+
+       rc = -ENOMEM;
+       if (count >= PAGE_SIZE)
+               goto out;
+
+       /* No partial writes. */
+       rc = -EINVAL;
+       if (*ppos != 0)
+               goto out;
+
+       rc = -ENOMEM;
+       req = kzalloc(count + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
+       if (!req)
+               goto out;
+
+       rc = -EFAULT;
+       if (copy_from_user(req, buf, count))
+               goto out;
+
+       rc = -ENOMEM;
+       oldcon = kzalloc(count + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
+       if (!oldcon)
+               goto out;
+
+       newcon = kzalloc(count + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
+       if (!newcon)
+               goto out;
+
+       taskcon = kzalloc(count + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
+       if (!taskcon)
+               goto out;
+
+       rc = -EINVAL;
+       if (sscanf(req, "%s %s %hu %s", oldcon, newcon, &tclass, taskcon) != 4)
+               goto out;
+
+       rc = security_context_str_to_sid(oldcon, &osid, GFP_KERNEL);
+       if (rc)
+               goto out;
+
+       rc = security_context_str_to_sid(newcon, &nsid, GFP_KERNEL);
+       if (rc)
+               goto out;
+
+       rc = security_context_str_to_sid(taskcon, &tsid, GFP_KERNEL);
+       if (rc)
+               goto out;
+
+       rc = security_validate_transition_user(osid, nsid, tsid, tclass);
+       if (!rc)
+               rc = count;
+out:
+       kfree(req);
+       kfree(oldcon);
+       kfree(newcon);
+       kfree(taskcon);
+       return rc;
+}
+
+static const struct file_operations sel_validatetrans_ops = {
+       .write          = sel_write_validatetrans,
+       .llseek         = generic_file_llseek,
+};
+
  /*
   * Remaining nodes use transaction based IO methods like nfsd/nfsctl.c
   */
@@ -1759,6 +1836,8 @@ static int sel_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void 
*data, int silent)
                [SEL_DENY_UNKNOWN] = {"deny_unknown", &sel_handle_unknown_ops, 
S_IRUGO},
                [SEL_STATUS] = {"status", &sel_handle_status_ops, S_IRUGO},
                [SEL_POLICY] = {"policy", &sel_policy_ops, S_IRUGO},
+               [SEL_VALIDATE_TRANS] = {"validatetrans", &sel_validatetrans_ops,
+                                       S_IWUSR},

Why only owner-writable? The other policy query operations are S_IWUGO, and thus only restricted by SELinux policy, so they can be used by processes running under a variety of UIDs.

                /* last one */ {""}
        };
        ret = simple_fill_super(sb, SELINUX_MAGIC, selinux_files);
diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/services.c b/security/selinux/ss/services.c
index ebb5eb3..527c90e 100644
--- a/security/selinux/ss/services.c
+++ b/security/selinux/ss/services.c
@@ -750,7 +750,7 @@ static void context_struct_compute_av(struct context 
*scontext,
                                 tclass, avd);
  }

-static int security_validtrans_handle_fail(struct context *ocontext,
+static void security_validtrans_audit_fail(struct context *ocontext,
                                           struct context *ncontext,
                                           struct context *tcontext,
                                           u16 tclass)
@@ -772,14 +772,10 @@ out:
        kfree(o);
        kfree(n);
        kfree(t);
-
-       if (!selinux_enforcing)
-               return 0;
-       return -EPERM;
  }

-int security_validate_transition(u32 oldsid, u32 newsid, u32 tasksid,
-                                u16 orig_tclass)
+static int security_compute_validatetrans(u32 oldsid, u32 newsid, u32 tasksid,
+                                         u16 orig_tclass, bool user)
  {
        struct context *ocontext;
        struct context *ncontext;
@@ -794,7 +790,10 @@ int security_validate_transition(u32 oldsid, u32 newsid, 
u32 tasksid,

        read_lock(&policy_rwlock);

-       tclass = unmap_class(orig_tclass);
+       if (!user)
+               tclass = unmap_class(orig_tclass);
+       else
+               tclass = orig_tclass;

        if (!tclass || tclass > policydb.p_classes.nprim) {
                printk(KERN_ERR "SELinux: %s:  unrecognized class %d\n",

I think we need to get rid of this printk, probably in general, but at least for the user case where class could be anything without a kernel bug. I think we already dropped the corresponding printk from compute_av and compute_sid long ago.

@@ -832,8 +831,16 @@ int security_validate_transition(u32 oldsid, u32 newsid, 
u32 tasksid,
        while (constraint) {
                if (!constraint_expr_eval(ocontext, ncontext, tcontext,
                                          constraint->expr)) {
-                       rc = security_validtrans_handle_fail(ocontext, ncontext,
-                                                            tcontext, tclass);
+                       if (!user)
+                               security_validtrans_audit_fail(ocontext,
+                                                               ncontext,
+                                                               tcontext,
+                                                               tclass);
+                       if (!selinux_enforcing)
+                               rc = 0;
+                       else
+                               rc = -EPERM;

Wondering if you were on the right path originally here, i.e. permit different enforcing modes for kernel vs userspace, since we do support that for the userspace AVC via AVC_OPT_SETENFORCE option to avc_open(3).

In that case, you don't actually need to modify security_validtrans_handle_fail; you can just do:
if (user)
        rc = -EPERM;
else
        rc = security_validtrans_handle_fail(ocontext, ncontext,
                                                tcontext, tclass);

+
                        goto out;
                }
                constraint = constraint->next;
@@ -844,6 +851,20 @@ out:
        return rc;
  }

+int security_validate_transition_user(u32 oldsid, u32 newsid, u32 tasksid,
+                                       u16 tclass)
+{
+       return security_compute_validatetrans(oldsid, newsid, tasksid,
+                                               tclass, true);
+}
+
+int security_validate_transition(u32 oldsid, u32 newsid, u32 tasksid,
+                                u16 orig_tclass)
+{
+       return security_compute_validatetrans(oldsid, newsid, tasksid,
+                                               orig_tclass, false);
+}
+
  /*
   * security_bounded_transition - check whether the given
   * transition is directed to bounded, or not.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to