On December 22, 2015 9:56:28 PM GMT+02:00, Mimi Zohar <zo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >On Tue, 2015-12-22 at 08:51 -0500, Sasha Levin wrote: >> Commit "IMA: policy can now be updated multiple times" assumed that >the >> policy would be updated at least once. >> >> If there are zero updates, the temporary list head object will get >added >> to the policy list, and later dereferenced as an IMA policy object, >which >> means that invalid memory will be accessed. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.le...@oracle.com> >> --- >> security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 3 +++ >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c >b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c >> index ba5d2fc..9b958b8 100644 >> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c >> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c >> @@ -431,6 +431,9 @@ void ima_update_policy(void) >> { >> struct list_head *first, *last, *policy; >> >> + if (list_empty(&ima_temp_rules)) >> + return; >> + >> /* append current policy with the new rules */ >> first = (&ima_temp_rules)->next; >> last = (&ima_temp_rules)->prev; > >Thanks, Sasha. By the time ima_update_policy() is called >ima_release_policy() has already output the policy update status >message. I guess an empty policy could be considered a valid policy. >Could you add a msg indicating that the new policy was empty?
As far as I can say we can't get to ima_update_policy() with empty ima_temp_rules because ima_write_policy() will set valid_policy to 0 in case of an empty rule. I'll double check it tomorrow, but please you do that too. cheers, Petko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html