Doug Ledford wrote:
>
> Jonathan A. Davis wrote:
> >
>
> That's more or less the way I see things. In any case, 2.1.x is getting
> close enough that you may just want to start using it. Personally, 2.1.123
> is the best 2.1.x kernel I've used so far and I would recommend it for SMP
> systems. At least with it, you either will work or you won't boot at all
> from what I've seen and heard on the lists.
>
I also have lockups on 2 of my three SMP-machines (a Gigybyte 586DX and
a
Asus P2B-DS), the third, a Gigybyte 686DLX runs fine - but I use no
XFree
on this machine.
Anyway, I use 2.0.35 on these machines and considered moving to 2.1.x
but
heard that these kernels are around 20% slower - is this still true?
Regards,
Hermann
--
Hermann Himmelbauer
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Addr.: A-3400 Klosterneuburg Konradtg. 13 Austria
Tel/Fax: ++43 2243 22305
