MOLNAR Ingo wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18 Dec 1998, Neil Conway wrote:
>
> > The first addresses some basic responsivity issues, and I think it's
> > clean and safe:
>
> heh, cool patch :) it's somewhat amusing that complete scheduler rewrites
> are being done due to 'solve' some seemingly fundamental problems, then
> finally someone tries and does understand the current scheduler and finds
> the real cause ;)
One comment though - Rik's scheduler patches look very useful
(particularly the bit that puts processes into round-robin at low
goodness once they have been on the run-q a while). As soon as I get my
hands on a version that's in sync with whichever kernel patch I'm on at
the time I'll be giving it a try ;-))
Neil
-
Linux SMP list: FIRST see FAQ at http://www.irisa.fr/prive/mentre/smp-faq/
To Unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe linux-smp" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
