I run it on 2.2.10 quite happly, what paticular kernel are you wanting it
for?
----- Original Message -----
From: Frank Butter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mark Harburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 1999 9:41 AM
Subject: Re: smp - procps (top, ps)
>
> On 30-Jun-99 Mark Harburn wrote:
> > Hi,
> > If you look on the SMP FAQ, theres a link to a patched procps that
supports
> > SMP in top, ps etc.
>
> right, but only to special kernel versions (2.0.36 and 2.2.1).
> I already contacted the authors of these patches and they told
> me to include it into the standard code was rejected by the
> maintainer. asking him I've got the answer I posted ...
>
>
> rgds-
> frank
>
>
> >> sorry, I posted this under the wrong subject before...
> >>
> >>
> >> I've gotten this answer on my question to the current
> >> maintainer of procps about supporting SMP (e.g. in ps, top):
> >>
> >> > The reason that procps doesn't support SMP information display is
that
> >> > the proc filesystem does not export it. That has to be fixed in the
> >> > kernel in order to fix it in procps.
> >>
> >> any comment?
> >>
> >> Frank
> >>
> >> -
>
> ---
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> cookie of the day:
> Life is like an analogy
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Frank Butter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> sent on 30-Jun-99, at 16:38:17
> OTTO-Chailease Mailorder Co., Ltd., Taipei
>
> -
> Linux SMP list: FIRST see FAQ at http://www.irisa.fr/prive/mentre/smp-faq/
> To Unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe linux-smp" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
-
Linux SMP list: FIRST see FAQ at http://www.irisa.fr/prive/mentre/smp-faq/
To Unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe linux-smp" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
