On Wed, 11 Aug 1999, Joe wrote:
> <noflame>
> NT does do somethings better than Linux and Linux does do
> somethings better than NT that is just the way it is. Every OS
> has its perks and quirks. I have worked with NT and have noticed
> that it's memory management is very different from 95, so be
> ware. In 95 someone I worked with allocated memory, and then
> freeded it. and then allocated some more. This new mem was
> pointint to the old mem location, and had the same info. when we
> accessed that info it was all there and hte program did not
> crash. In NT this same process caused the program to crash,
> same code same program, both compiled under NT and 95 and had
> the same results. Apparantly when we reallocated the menory, we
> did not get the same memory location or NT had cleared it for us
> and the data that we referenced was not there anymore. It was a
> case of bad code, worked under 95, but did not under NT.
> </noflame>
If this is the way all windows programs are written, the I don't have any
questions any more.
Robert Sander "Is it Friday yet?"
@Home http://home.pages.de/~gurubert
pgp available there
-
Linux SMP list: FIRST see FAQ at http://www.irisa.fr/prive/mentre/smp-faq/
To Unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe linux-smp" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
