[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Christian E wrote:
>
> > I've had it running Redhat 6.0 in the beginning, but it was way to
> > unstable...If you're planning to run Redhat I'll suggest you stick with
> > 5.2...
>
> What kind of problems were you having with Red Hat 6.0? That's what I
> intend to run.
I had a lot of problems with Samba. Unstable and erratic behaviour (the
daemon crashed etc.). I got a lot of response from people on
mailing-lists stating that they had a stable setup. I had a vanilla 6.0
setup. I was recommended to patch various things such as kernel and
samba, but I decided to go for a 5.2 setup instead. It worked out of the
box without any problems whatsoever. Maybe 6.0 will work for you, but I
wouldn't recommend it for a server that's for sure..
best regards
Christian
--
Christian Ejstrup, RF Development Engineer/ IT- Administrator.
Texas Instruments A/S, Denmark ,Sofiendalsvej 85,DK-9200 Aalborg
SV,Denmark
Phone:+45 96346868, Phone(direct):+45 96346860, GSM:+45 22234304
-
Linux SMP list: FIRST see FAQ at http://www.irisa.fr/prive/mentre/smp-faq/
To Unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe linux-smp" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
