Yes it is quite valid as is, I just suspect that the polishings needs to be done as well as 3DNow!. But as we see it's not far off. -- Brian D. Haymore University of Utah Center for High Performance Computing 155 South 1452 East RM 405 Salt Lake City, Ut 84112-0190 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Phone: (801) 585-1755 - Fax: (801) 585-5366 On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Alan Cox wrote: > > What optimizations did you use with the PGI compiler? If you used many > > optimizations like sse that can accelerate a PIII then it is not a valid > > comparison to the potential of the AMD Athlon since the PGI and GCC > > compilers do not optimize for the Athlon or 3DNow! yet. > > So if you are using the PGI compiler already its quite valid > - Linux SMP list: FIRST see FAQ at http://www.irisa.fr/prive/dmentre/smp-howto/ To Unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe linux-smp" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Athlon and floating point (was: SMP Celeron or U... Neil Conway
- Re: Athlon and floating point (was: SMP Celeron... Alan Cox
- Re: Athlon and floating point (was: SMP Cel... Herbert Wengatz 42850
- Re: Athlon and floating point (was: SMP... Don Holmgren
- Re: Athlon and floating point (was:... Herbert Huber
- Re: Athlon and floating point ... Alan Cox
- Re: Athlon and floating point ... Brian D. Haymore
- Re: Athlon and floating point ... Brian D. Haymore
- Re: Athlon and floating point ... Alan Cox
- Re: Athlon and floating point ... Herbert Huber
- Re: Athlon and floating point ... Brian D. Haymore
- Re: Athlon and floating point (was:... Neil Conway
- Re: Athlon and floating point ... Don Holmgren
- Re: Athlon and floating point ... Chris Pirih
- Re: Athlon and floating point ... Don Holmgren
- Re: Athlon/Intel floating poin... Neil Conway
- Re: Athlon and floating point (was: SMP... Herbert Huber
- Re: SMP Celeron or UP P2? xrr
- Re: SMP Celeron or UP P2? Marc Schneiders
- Re: SMP Celeron or UP P2? Greg Youngblood
- Re: SMP Celeron or UP P2? Adam D . McKenna
