On Wed, 5 Jan 2000, Matt Aylward wrote: > Sounds like the athlon is the way to go. My own reading around the hardware > sites on the net was leaning me that way, but not being very SMP savvy I wasn't I don't have an Athlon but I reckon if you do a lot of s/w development, the twin Celeron is better. make -j2 on a BP6 with 2 x C400s is darned quick. - Linux SMP list: FIRST see FAQ at http://www.irisa.fr/prive/dmentre/smp-howto/ To Unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe linux-smp" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- dual celerons vs athlon ???? Matt Aylward
- Re: dual celerons vs athlon ???? Matt Luker
- Re: dual celerons vs athlon ???? Aaron Tiensivu
- Re: dual celerons vs athlon ???? Johan Kullstam
- Re: dual celerons vs athlon ???? Peter Svensson
- Re: dual celerons vs athlon ???? Chris Pirih
- Re: dual celerons vs athlon ???? Matt Aylward
- Re: dual celerons vs athlon ???? Mariusz W Stanisz
- Re: dual celerons vs athlon ???? Matt Aylward
- Re: dual celerons vs athlon ???? Sandy Harris
- Re: dual celerons vs athlon ???? Taso Hatzi
- Re: dual celerons vs athlon ???? Herbert Wengatz 42850
- Re: dual celerons vs athlon ???? Matt Aylward
- RE: dual celerons vs athlon ???? nathan . zook
- RE: dual celerons vs athlon ???? pape
- RE: dual celerons vs athlon ???? Mark Hahn
- Re: dual celerons vs athlon ???? Herbert Wengatz 42850
- Pointless argument [WAS Re: dual ce... Adam McKenna
