On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 01:12:56PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 06:31:58PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > diff --git a/mm/mremap.c b/mm/mremap.c
> > index 9e68a02a52b1..2fd163cff406 100644
> > --- a/mm/mremap.c
> > +++ b/mm/mremap.c
> > @@ -191,6 +191,54 @@ static void move_ptes(struct vm_area_struct *vma, 
> > pmd_t *old_pmd,
> >             drop_rmap_locks(vma);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static bool move_normal_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long 
> > old_addr,
> > +             unsigned long new_addr, unsigned long old_end,
> > +             pmd_t *old_pmd, pmd_t *new_pmd, bool *need_flush)
> > +{
> > +   spinlock_t *old_ptl, *new_ptl;
> > +   struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
> > +
> > +   if ((old_addr & ~PMD_MASK) || (new_addr & ~PMD_MASK)
> > +       || old_end - old_addr < PMD_SIZE)
> > +           return false;
> > +
> > +   /*
> > +    * The destination pmd shouldn't be established, free_pgtables()
> > +    * should have release it.
> > +    */
> > +   if (WARN_ON(!pmd_none(*new_pmd)))
> > +           return false;
> > +
> > +   /*
> > +    * We don't have to worry about the ordering of src and dst
> > +    * ptlocks because exclusive mmap_sem prevents deadlock.
> > +    */
> > +   old_ptl = pmd_lock(vma->vm_mm, old_pmd);
> > +   if (old_ptl) {
> 
> How can it ever be false?
> 
> > +           pmd_t pmd;
> > +
> > +           new_ptl = pmd_lockptr(mm, new_pmd);


Looks like this is largely inspired by move_huge_pmd(), I guess a lot of
the code applies, why not just reuse as much as possible? The same comments
w.r.t mmap_sem helping protect against lock order issues applies as well.

> > +           if (new_ptl != old_ptl)
> > +                   spin_lock_nested(new_ptl, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
> > +
> > +           /* Clear the pmd */
> > +           pmd = *old_pmd;
> > +           pmd_clear(old_pmd);
> > +
> > +           VM_BUG_ON(!pmd_none(*new_pmd));
> > +
> > +           /* Set the new pmd */
> > +           set_pmd_at(mm, new_addr, new_pmd, pmd);
> > +           if (new_ptl != old_ptl)
> > +                   spin_unlock(new_ptl);
> > +           spin_unlock(old_ptl);
> > +
> > +           *need_flush = true;
> > +           return true;
> > +   }
> > +   return false;
> > +}
> > +
> -- 
>  Kirill A. Shutemov
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc

Reply via email to