On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 12:32:50PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 11/6/18 6:06 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 02:54:25PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Changes in v4:
> >>
> >> - dropped initrd_below_start_ok assignment in ARM64, not necessary at
> >>   all (Ard)
> >> - replace #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD with if
> >>   (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD) for consistency with other parts
> >>   of arm64_memblock_init() (Rob)
> >>
> >> Changes in v3:
> >>
> >> - use C conditionals in drivers/of/fdt.c
> >> - added check on phys_initrd_size in arch/arm64/mm/init.c to determine
> >>   whether initrd_start must be populated
> >> - fixed a build warning with ARC that was just missing an (unsigned
> >>   long) cast
> >>
> >> Changes in v2:
> >>
> >> - get rid of ARCH_HAS_PHYS_INITRD and instead define
> >>   phys_initrd_start/phys_initrd_size in init/do_mounts_initrd.c
> >>
> >> - make __early_init_dt_declare_initrd() account for ARM64 specific
> >>   behavior with __va() when having CONFIG_DEBUG_VM enabled
> >>
> >> - consolidate early_initrd() command line parsing into
> >>   init/do_mounts_initrd.c
> >>
> >> Because phys_initrd_start/phys_initrd_size are now compiled in
> >> ini/do_mounts_initrd.c which is only built with CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD=y,
> >> we need to be a bit careful about the uses throughout architecture
> >> specific code.
> >>
> >> Previous discussions/submissions list here:
> >>
> >> v3:
> >> https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg683566.html
> >> v2:
> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/25/4
> >>
> >> Florian Fainelli (6):
> >>   nds32: Remove phys_initrd_start and phys_initrd_size
> >>   arch: Make phys_initrd_start and phys_initrd_size global variables
> >>   of/fdt: Populate phys_initrd_start/phys_initrd_size from FDT
> >>   arm64: Utilize phys_initrd_start/phys_initrd_size
> >>   of/fdt: Remove custom __early_init_dt_declare_initrd() implementation
> >>   arch: Move initrd= parsing into do_mounts_initrd.c
> > 
> > For the series:
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <r...@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> Thanks Mike, Rob, do you want to merge that series through the OF tree?

Sure, some arch maintainer acks would be nice.

Rob

_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc

Reply via email to