On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 7:41 PM Sam Ravnborg <s...@ravnborg.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 07:34:59PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

> >
> > I think you somehow missed the Kconfig change, and also the related
> > sparc32 change which continue to have set_fs() after this patch.

Right, thanks for pointing out the issue.

> I now notice the sparc32 bits are in the last patch.
> To avoid breaking bisect-ability on sparc64 I think you need to merge
> the sparc32 changes with this patch, unless the sparc64 changes can
> coexist with CONFIG_SET_FS continue to be set.

I originally had them in the reverse order and broke bisectability during my
rebase. The end result is still fine, but now I need to move the 'select
SET_FS' from CONFIG_SPARC to CONFIG_SPARC32 in this patch
and then remove it again from there in the last step.

I've done that in my local copy now.

         Arnd

_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc

Reply via email to