On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 06:28:33PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 4:27 PM Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote: > > > > arch_cpu_idle() is a very simple idle interface and exposes only a > > single idle state and is expected to not require RCU and not do any > > tracing/instrumentation. > > > > As such, omap_sram_idle() is not a valid implementation. Replace it > > with the simple (shallow) omap3_do_wfi() call. Leaving the more > > complicated idle states for the cpuidle driver. > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org> > > I see similar code in omap2: > > omap2_pm_idle() > -> omap2_enter_full_retention() > -> omap2_sram_suspend() > > Is that code path safe to use without RCU or does it need a similar change?
It needs a similar change, clearly I was running on fumes to not have found that when grepping around the omap code :/ _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
