On Tue, 2023-06-13 at 10:43 +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 05:10:27PM -0700, Rick Edgecombe wrote:
> > The x86 Shadow stack feature includes a new type of memory called
> > shadow
> > stack. This shadow stack memory has some unusual properties, which
> > requires
> > some core mm changes to function properly.
> > 
> > One of these unusual properties is that shadow stack memory is
> > writable,
> > but only in limited ways. These limits are applied via a specific
> > PTE
> > bit combination. Nevertheless, the memory is writable, and core mm
> > code
> > will need to apply the writable permissions in the typical paths
> > that
> > call pte_mkwrite(). Future patches will make pte_mkwrite() take a
> > VMA, so
> > that the x86 implementation of it can know whether to create
> > regular
> > writable memory or shadow stack memory.
> 
> Nit:                            ^ mapping?

Hmm, sure.

> 
> > But there are a couple of challenges to this. Modifying the
> > signatures of
> > each arch pte_mkwrite() implementation would be error prone because
> > some
> > are generated with macros and would need to be re-implemented.
> > Also, some
> > pte_mkwrite() callers operate on kernel memory without a VMA.
> > 
> > So this can be done in a three step process. First pte_mkwrite()
> > can be
> > renamed to pte_mkwrite_novma() in each arch, with a generic
> > pte_mkwrite()
> > added that just calls pte_mkwrite_novma(). Next callers without a
> > VMA can
> > be moved to pte_mkwrite_novma(). And lastly, pte_mkwrite() and all
> > callers
> > can be changed to take/pass a VMA.
> > 
> > Start the process by renaming pte_mkwrite() to pte_mkwrite_novma()
> > and
> > adding the pte_mkwrite() wrapper in linux/pgtable.h. Apply the same
> > pattern for pmd_mkwrite(). Since not all archs have a
> > pmd_mkwrite_novma(),
> > create a new arch config HAS_HUGE_PAGE that can be used to tell if
> > pmd_mkwrite() should be defined. Otherwise in the !HAS_HUGE_PAGE
> > cases the
> > compiler would not be able to find pmd_mkwrite_novma().
> > 
> > No functional change.
> > 
> > Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-al...@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
> > Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> > Cc: linux-c...@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-hexa...@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-i...@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: loonga...@lists.linux.dev
> > Cc: linux-m...@lists.linux-m68k.org
> > Cc: Michal Simek <mon...@monstr.eu>
> > Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dingu...@kernel.org>
> > Cc: linux-m...@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: openr...@lists.librecores.org
> > Cc: linux-par...@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org
> > Cc: linux-ri...@lists.infradead.org
> > Cc: linux-s...@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: sparcli...@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux...@lists.infradead.org
> > Cc: linux-a...@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux...@kvack.org
> > Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linuxfoundation.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgeco...@intel.com>
> > Link:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wizjsu7c9sfyzb3q04108stghff2wfbokgccgw7riz...@mail.gmail.com/
> 
> Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <r...@kernel.org>

Thanks!
_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc

Reply via email to